Cinder!

We are incredibly excited to announce that Cinder (formerly known as Flint) has now officially been released into the wild as an open source project. As described on the main page at libcinder.org, “Cinder is a community-developed, free and open source library for professional-quality creative coding in C++.”
So why did we do this, you might ask? Well, it originated as a solution to a fairly kludge-y work-flow we were using to create music visualizers. We were basically designing in Processing, porting to C++ and testing; repeat. At one point we even considered developing a magic-box type macro that would convert a Processing sketch into C++ and then to an iTunes visualizer. I had also coded a basically blank iTunes visualizer that piped FFT data to processing. Good times, but not ideal. At all.
Instead, we started an internal project codenamed ‘Flint ’ (not only because we liked the name, but because the namespace sounded cool: fli::Surface, etc). The project had two main goals:
First, when we needed to be in C++ (for iTunes plug-ins etc.) we wanted to have our creative coders be able to make things directly in C++. It needed to be approachable. For a while, we called this “The Robert Case” after Robert Hodgin, who was a driving force in making a ton of amazing stuff here at TBG.
Second, we wanted to make sure that any approachability enhancements did not prevent the more hardcore developers from doing the “bare-metal” programming. That was the “AFB Case” after Andrew Bell, who wrote the majority of Cinder here, and has been writing C++ code for ever.
We’ve used various incarnations of Cinder on projects like the augmented reality issue of Esquire Magazine, a music visualizer for Relentless, and Magnetosphere, as well as several internal experiments.
I would also like to reiterate some things that we’ve said in the FAQ of libcinder.org. One, we cannot say enough great things about Processing. It’s not only a great way to dip your toe into the waters of creative coding, but also a powerful platform for doing advanced and amazing things. Another incredible project out there is openFrameworks, which is led by some amazingly talented people and has a great community surrounding it.
I am so glad that we were able to make Cinder open source. Andrew and I both expected a certain amount of internal resistance attempting to do so (a lot of hours went into this!), but that resistance never materialized. We have been the beneficiaries of too many open source projects to list, and we all felt that giving back was the only move we could feel good about.
Check out the cinder website here: http://libcinder.org
Grab the source here: http://github.com/cinder/Cinder

haha. IRL watermark

haha. IRL watermark

Lights, Bots, Action! Former Car-Assembly Droids Get Career...

Lights, Bots, Action! Former Car-Assembly Droids Get Career Reboot | Magazine p. Awesome seeing the gang at Autofuss get a sweet little writeup in Wired!

I love when records show up in the mail. I also love when Nick...

I love when records show up in the mail. I also love when Nick photobombs my snaps. Today is officially GOLD FOIL AWESOME DAY !!!

p.s. I’ve wanted that Q And Not U 7” for YEARS now, beyond in love with Dischord for repressing it!

boobquake? BOOBQUAKE.

A lot of feminists hated it, a lot of sleazy guys trolled it, but even so, I found the whole Boobquake thing pretty endearing. Also, McCreight’s scientific analysis of Boobquake has some statistics, and I’m a sucker for statistics. So anyways, I decided to collect tweets that mention “boobquake” or ”#boobquake” (the hashtag that people used to comment on the event) and churn out some basic numbers about the trend.
(The background, for those who didn’t tune in: Iranian cleric Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi says some crazy thing about how women who don’t dress modestly cause earthquakes. One such woman, Jennifer McCreight, reads this on the internet, and makes a modest proposal to test this hypothesis. She asks women everywhere to wear sultry clothing on Monday, April 26th to see whether or not their combined efforts will cause said earthquake. The Internet quickly falls in love with this potent mix of geekiness, feminism, sex, and humor, and so Boobquake was born.)
I found that there were 47,050 tweets about Boobquake. I wasn’t able to get tweets from the 19th, so there are probably another few hundred tweets that I missed. Even so, this pales in comparison to the 213,834 attendees on Boobquake’s Facebook event page. Boobquake, in other words, seems to be a Facebook-centric event.
Still, tweets about boobquake can tell us some interesting things about the boobquake trend. (An aside: I get sad when people talk about things ‘going viral,’ because this phrase tends to obscure major differences that exist between online trends. Yes, boobquake became very popular, but what else can we say about it?)
I like to look at the ‘velocity’ and ‘duration’ of a trend. Here’s what boobquake looked like:
This strikes me as a pretty sharp spike as compared to other curves I’ve seen for Twitter trends, and is clearly very tied to the day of boobquake itself. It seems most people heard about and weighed in on boobquake day, then quickly lost interest.
Another thing I try to look into is the ‘distribution’ of a trend. Who, in other words, is taking part in the conversation, and who, if anyone, is leading it? There’s a lot of fancy ways to figure that out, but as an initial step, I looked at who was getting mentioned in these tweets. As it turns out, McCreight (@jennifurret) gets mentioned a ton—1907 times as compared to #2 @mashable ’s 307 times. This, combined with McCreight’s TV appearances etc., suggests to me that McCreight didn’t just start, but remained at the reigns of the boobquake conversation throughout. There were a total of ~20k mentions in this set of tweets, however, so it’s hard to put her influence in perspective without more analysis.
The last thing worth mentioning that I found in this set of tweets was a number of sub-trends—boobquake aftershocks, if you will. I found, for example, 1332 tweets that mention ‘brainquake’, a movement of women who would rather show off their brains than their boobs (story here). I also found 89 tweets that mention ’#iranianpickuplines,’ each of which has a mature and charming quip along the lines of ‘Is that your cleavage? Or a fault line?’. I think Twitter’s open structure tends to encourage this splintering of trends, which, depending on the kind of message you’re trying to get out, can be a double-edged sword.
(Special thanks to my Web Ecology Project colleague @erhardt, who first told me about #boobquake and was particularly interested in the breakdown of #boobquake versus #brainquake on Twitter; his girlfriend hoped that Brainquake would be the more powerful force. Alas.)

The CSI Effect

Ha. So it turns out that because of all the CSI and Law&Order jurors are watching these days they think they know a whole lot more about forensics and criminal investigations than they really do :

Prosecutors in the United States are now spending much more time explaining to juries why certain kinds of evidence are not relevant. Prosecutors have even introduced a new kind of witness-a “negative evidence” witness-to explain that investigators often fail to find evidence at a crime scene.

Apparently it cuts both ways, though, as criminals are also watching these shows and learning some tricks to cover their tracks. I love TV.

COMMENTS OPEN

Special Event: Node.js!

Continuing in the general theme of Event Driven servers, we will review the specifics of Node.js, a Javascript-based server of immense recent popularity.

barbariangroup.com - Geocities-ized!

Welcome to this blog post! This is what our site might look like if it were still 1998, and we had just learned how to use the Internet. Click on the image to see the actual site, Geocities-ized!
You can also go and click on this web link to Geocities-ize other websites. Have a good day and please come back to this blog post soon! Also, please feel free to comment in my guest book below.